Showing 1 - 10 of 11
This study experimentally investigates gender quotas in light of peer review. We investigate competitions with and without gender quotas and a peer review process that allows for sabotage. Our findings show that the possibility of peer sabotage renders the gender quota ineffective in encouraging...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011343764
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011899872
Using a field experiment in India where patients are randomly assigned to rank among a set of physicians of the same gender but with different castes and years of experience, we show that the differences in patients' physician choices are consistent with gender-based statistical discrimination....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014087384
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012293004
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011587173
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011792212
We randomly assign more than 6,000 students from 150 primary schools in Bangladesh to work on math assignments in one of three settings: individually, in groups with random schoolmates, or in groups with friends. The groups consist of four people and are balanced by average cognitive ability and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011636679
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014525548
This study experimentally investigates gender quotas in light of peer review. We investigate competitions with and without gender quotas and a peer review process that allows for sabotage. Our findings show that the possibility of peer sabotage renders the gender quota ineffective in encouraging...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013315526
We randomly assign more than 6,000 students from 150 primary schools in Bangladesh to work on math assignments in one of three settings: individually, in groups with random schoolmates, or in groups with friends. The groups consist of four people and are balanced by average cognitive ability and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012959043