Showing 71 - 80 of 258
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005061531
All existing impossibility theorems on judgment aggregation over logically connected propositions have one of two restrictions: they either use a controversial systematicity condition or apply only to special agendas of propositions with rich logical connections. An important open question is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408407
It is known that majority voting among several individuals on logically interconnected propositions may generate irrational collective judgments. We generalize majority voting by considering quota rules, which accept each proposition if and only if the number of individuals accepting it exceeds...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005408431
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752969
In the theory of judgment aggregation on logically connected propositions, an important question remains open: Which aggregation rules are manipulable and which are strategy-proof? We define manipulability and strategy-proofness in judgment aggregation, characterize all strategy-proof...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010745758
In response to recent work on the aggregation of individual judgments on logically connected propositions into collective judgments, it is often asked whether judgment aggregation is a special case of Arrowian preference aggregation. We argue the op- posite. After proving a general impossibility...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010745935
The paper attached is the revised 23 April 2010 version.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010746030
In judgment aggregation, unlike preference aggregation, not much is known about domain restrictions that guarantee consistent majority outcomes. We introduce several conditions on individual judgments sufficient for consistent majority judgments. Some are based on global orders of propositions...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010746419
How can different individuals’ probability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective probability assignment? Although there are several classic results on this problem, they all assume that the ‘agenda’of relevant events forms a -algebra, an overly demanding assumption for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010746642
"Reason-based rationalizations" explain an agent's choices by specifying which properties of the options or choice context he/she cares about (the "motivationally salient properties") and how he/she cares about these properties the "fundamental preference relation"). We characterize the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010747940