Showing 1 - 10 of 264
In the context of repeated public good contribution games, we experimentally investigate the impact of democratic punishment, when members of a group decide by majority voting whether to inflict punishment on another member, relative to individual peer-to-peer punishment. Democratic punishment...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510711
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011433227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011343160
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009714735
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010201739
We experimentally study the impact of adding an explicit nil vote option to the ballot in both compulsory and voluntary voting settings. We investigate this issue in an informational voting setting, in which some voters are uninformed and face the swing voter’s curse, implying that they can...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011458158
This paper experimentally investigates the effects of a costly punishment option on cooperation and social welfare in long finitely repeated public good contribution games. In a perfect monitoring environment increasing the severity of the potential punishment monotonically increases both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013118506
This paper experimentally investigates how individual preferences, through unrestricted deliberation, are aggregated into a group decision in two contexts: reciprocating gifts and choosing between lotteries. In both contexts, we find that median group members have a significant impact on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013052034
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010188911
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012259114