Showing 11 - 20 of 412
This paper suggests a combination procedure to exploit the imperfect correlation of cointegration tests to develop a more powerful meta test. To exemplify, we combine Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) tests. Either of these underlying tests can be more powerful than the other one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003725800
This paper suggests a combination procedure to exploit the imperfect correlation of cointegration tests to develop a more powerful meta test. To exemplify, we combine Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) tests. Either of these underlying tests can be more powerful than the other one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012724343
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003868511
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003937116
This paper proposes a new panel unit root test based on Simes' [Biometrika 1986, An Improved Bonferroni Procedure for Multiple Tests of Significanceʺ] classical intersection test. The test is robust to general patterns of cross-sectional dependence and yet straightforward to implement, only...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003835930
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009633336
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009271208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009717798
We use meta analytic combination procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration. The main idea consists in combining p-values from time series cointegration tests on the different units of the panel. The tests are robust to heterogeneity as well as to cross-sectional dependence between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394598
Time series cointegration tests, even in the presence of large sample sizes, often yield conflicting conclusions ("mixed signalsʺ) as measured by, inter alia, a low correlation of empirical p-values [see Gregory et al., 2004, Journal of Applied Econometrics]. Using their methodology, we present...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394608