Showing 91 - 100 of 738,656
-period competition, but simultaneously removes constraints to successful future innovation. The choice of whether to vigorously pursue … (2007) to study patent litigation strategy and rates of innovation. We show that a legal regime where infringement is … strategy effect may reduce levels of innovation. Antitrust policy should seek to attenuate this effect, and may do so by …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012867796
While price-fixing cartel prosecutions have received significant attention, the policy determinants and the political preferences that guide such antitrust prosecutions remain understudied. We empirically examine the intertemporal shifts in U.S. antitrust cartel prosecutions during the period...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013003617
While price-fixing cartel prosecutions have received significant attention, the policy determinants and the political preferences that guide such antitrust prosecutions remain understudied. We empirically examine the intertemporal shifts in U.S. antitrust cartel prosecutions during the period...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013012564
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012321209
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012231200
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012035670
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011660336
In Credit Suisse v. Billing, the Court held that the securities law implicitly precludes the application of the antitrust laws to the conduct alleged in that case. The Court considered several factors, including the availability and competence of other laws to regulate unwanted behavior, and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217500
benefits of greater efficiency, economic prosperity and innovation? In other words, is the adoption of these antitrust laws … the impact of antitrust policy on innovation. While our research focuses on antitrust policy, this project provides an …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014254619
Owners of standard essential patents (SEPs) are cast as villains for engaging in “patent hold-up,” i.e., taking advantage of the fact that they negotiate royalties with implementer-licensees that already have made sunk investments in the standard. In contrast to “patent ambush,” patent...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014111680