Showing 1 - 10 of 500
We analyze the rationale for hiding information in open auction formats. In particular, we focus on the incentives for a bidder to call a price higher than the highest standing one in order to prevent the remaining active bidders from aggregating more accurate information that could be gathered...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010842922
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011306048
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009691218
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011557674
We analyze the rationale for hiding information in open auction formats. In particular, we focus on the incentives for a bidder to call a price higher than the highest standing one in order to prevent the remaining active bidders from aggregating more accurate information that could be gathered...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013098020
We show that jump bids can be used by a bidder to create a winner's curse and preserve an informational advantage that would otherwise disappear in the course of an open ascending auction. The effect of the winner's curse is to create allocative distortions and reduce the seller's expected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013024142
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012302620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011627005
We show that the commitment to not allocate may be exploited by a seller/social planner to increase the expected social surplus that can be achieved in the sale of an indivisible unit.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010842901
We show that open ascending auctions are prone to inecient rushes, i.e. all bidders quitting at the same price, in market environments such as privatizations, takeover contests, and procurement auctions. Rushes arise when an incumbent with better information about a common value component of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010842918