Showing 31 - 40 of 643,729
between decision rules inspired by ranking-based utilitarianism and the majority rule …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013315598
This paper analyzes strategy-proof collective choice rules when individuals have single-crossing preferences on a finite and ordered set of social alternatives. It shows that a social choice rule is anonymous, unanimous, and strategy-proof on a maximal single-crossing domain if and only if it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011699125
emerging social choice theory -, two conflicting ways of dealing with mathematical tools in welfare economics and, above all …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011610213
The problem of social choice is studied on a domain with countably many individuals. In contrast to most of the existing literature which establish either non-constructive possibilities or approximate (i.e. invisible) dictators, we show that if one adds a continuity property to the usual set of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011967421
In this paper, we show that in pure exchange economies where the number of goods equals or exceeds the number of agents, any Pareto-efficient and strategy-proof allocation mechanism always allocates the total endowment to some single agent even if the receivers vary.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011744271
We study strategy-proof rules for choosing between two alternatives. We consider the full preference domain which allows for indifference. In this framework, for strategy-proof rules, ontoness does not imply efficiency. We weaken the requirement of efficiency to ontoness and characterizes the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012946240
This paper analyzes strategy-proof collective choice rules when individuals have single-crossing preferences on a finite and ordered set of social alternatives. It shows that a social choice rule is anonymous, unanimous, and strategy-proof on a maximal single-crossing domain if and only if it is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012949960
If only the strict part of social preference is required to be transitive then Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives implies that there is a coalition containing all but one individual that cannot force x to be socially ranked above y for at least half of the pairs of alternatives (x,y)
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014217938
This paper investigates the number of profiles at which a social choice function is manipulable. It is found that there is a lower bound on this number when the social choice function is assumed non-dictatorial. Also, any number between this lower bound and the maximal number of profiles may be...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014221607
" from mathematical psychology, and "social welfare orderings" from social choice theory. We use a probabilistic choice model …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014221626