Showing 1 - 10 of 67
We examine how interpersonal and group-level factors relate to prosocial motivations and group negotiation outcomes. Three studies showed that superordinate group identification and interpersonal attraction positively influence each other, and underlie prosocial value orientations, and joint...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014070319
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10006973548
The present research examined how intra- and inter-team discussions prior to negotiations affect negotiation processes and outcomes. A Pilot Study showed that intra-team discussions motivate negotiators to understand the underlying interests more deeply (i.e. epistemic motivation), whereas...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014043171
Two interactive studies on multiparty negotiations - with parties represented by several negotiators - show that different interaction structures (or caucusing structures) influence the formation of shared social identities, thereby influencing negotiation behavior and outcomes (Study 1, N =...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014064468
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010234274
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012660301
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012244116
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013464461
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001056220
System justification theory (SJT; Jost & Banaji, 1994) proposes that people have an inherent motive to support societal systems, even at the expense of their personal and group interests. However, the evidence for this system justification motive is mixed, and a close examination of the relevant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012946063