Showing 1 - 10 of 109,508
vote independently of each other. Thus, we receive as an empirical result what the previous voting power literature assumed. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012019199
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015074621
In this paper the concepts of manipulation as strategic voting (misrepresentation of true preferences) and strategic …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010529891
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012543894
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012098924
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012289867
The common use of majority rule in group decision making is puzzling. In theory, it inequitably favors the proposer, and paradoxically, it disadvantages voters further if they are inequity averse. In practice, however, outcomes are equitable. The present paper analyzes data from a novel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011762571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010509210
We study the issue of assigning weights to players that identify winning coalitions in plurality voting democracies … is at least one winning coalition. Such a game is said to be precisely supportive if it is possible to assign weights to … players in such a way that a coalition being winning in a partition implies that the combined weight of its members is maximal …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014104553
In his seminal Social Choice and Individual Values, Kenneth Arrow stated that his theory applies to voting. Many voting … theorists have been convinced that, on account of Arrow's theorem, all voting methods must be seriously flawed. Arrow's theory … all voting methods are cardinal and therefore outside the reach of Arrow's result. Parallel to Arrow's ordinal approach …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010440461