Subject retrieval of scholarly monographs via electronic databases
Purpose – Scholarly monographs are a major information resource in the humanities. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of abstracting and indexing (A&I) databases and library catalogues (OPACs) for subject retrieval of these monographs. Design/methodology/approach – A sample of monographs in philosophy was checked in the Philosopher's Index database and in library OPACs to establish how many subject terms were assigned per page of text. Findings – The results highlighted the inadequate indexing of monographs in these databases. Various methods of improving subject access are discussed, including enriched subject content of database records. The search potential of full‐text databases is examined, with specific reference to two such databases, Oxford Scholarship Online and JSTOR. Practical implications – It is suggested that current and planned digitization projects need to incorporate improved search facilities, either by automatic generation of subject‐rich document surrogates, or by the incorporation of author‐generated metadata. Originality/value – This paper clarifies the current problems related to subject retrieval of scholarly monographs at a time when the launch of major digitization projects calls for urgent attention to this issue.
Year of publication: |
2006
|
---|---|
Authors: | East, John W. |
Published in: |
Journal of Documentation. - Emerald Group Publishing Limited, ISSN 1758-7379, ZDB-ID 1479864-5. - Vol. 62.2006, 5, p. 597-605
|
Publisher: |
Emerald Group Publishing Limited |
Subject: | Database management systems | Monographs | Text retrieval | Indexing | Information operations | Information retrieval |
Saved in:
Online Resource
Saved in favorites
Similar items by subject
-
Global text project: new horizons in textbook marketing
Pitt, Leyland F., (2009)
-
Open access books through open data sources: assessing prevalence, providers, and preservation
Laakso, Mikael, (2023)
-
The relative effects of knowledge, interest and confidence in assessing relevance
Ruthven, Ian, (2007)
- More ...