Why wonder bread lost no dough: Materiality, settlements and the FTC's ad sustantiation program
Previous studies (e.g., by Sam Peltzman) reveal powerful share-value effects of Federal Trade Commission (FTC) actions against firms for allegedly false advertising. Curi- ously, however, when the FTC announces an investigation but simultaneous settlement of the case with the advertiser, no adverse impact results, an empirical finding thus far un- explained. This article uses a recent FTC action, in which the accused advertiser suffered no adverse equity impact, to explain that result. The article focuses on the empirical is- sue of materiality. Many advertising messages challenged by the FTC are not material to consumers. If not - and especially when, as in the case discussed here, the advertiser had much earlier discontinued the advertising challenged - the advertiser predictably would not suffer. Econometric evidence strongly indicates that the messages the FTC chal- lenged were immaterial to consumers.
Year of publication: |
2004
|
---|---|
Authors: | Higgins, Richard S. ; McChesney, Fred S. |
Publisher: |
Evanston, IL : Northwestern University, Center for the Study of Industrial Organization (CSIO) |
Saved in:
freely available
Series: | CSIO Working Paper ; 0074 |
---|---|
Type of publication: | Book / Working Paper |
Type of publication (narrower categories): | Working Paper |
Language: | English |
Other identifiers: | 508671175 [GVK] hdl:10419/38677 [Handle] |
Source: |
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010325615
Saved in favorites
Similar items by person
-
Why wonder bread lost no dough : materiality, settlements and the FTC's ad sustantiation program
Higgins, Richard S., (2004)
-
More can be better : contribution and setoffs in antitrust
Goetz, Charles J., (2006)
-
Materiality, settlements and the FTC'S ad substantiation program : why wonder bread lost no dough
Higgins, Richard S., (2011)
- More ...