Showing 1 - 9 of 9
Recent evidence from the field (Hossain and List, 2009) suggests that contracts framed in terms of a loss (a deduction is taken for failing to meet a threshold) lead to greater effort than contracts framed in terms of a gain (a bonus is given for meeting a threshold). We investigate two...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010552143
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009519728
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009519729
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009519730
A party dissatisfied with the contractual performance of a counterparty is typically able to pursue a variety of legal recourses. Within this apparent variety lurk two fundamental alternatives. The aggrieved party may (i) “affirm” the contract and seek money damages or specific performance; or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014199798
Recent research suggests that loss framed contracts are an effective instrument for principals to maximize the effort of their agents. Framing effects arise from defining thresholds that vary the salience of losses and gains while preserving payoff equivalence of the underlying contract. While...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012938228
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009836408
Easy availability of rescission followed by restitution has, for centuries, unsettled legal authorities, who fear it as a threat to commercial order or other normative values. Responding to these fears, authorities have limited the ease with which rescission may be elected. Their approach is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014195986
It is commonly held that if getting a contractual remedy was costless and fully compensatory, rescission followed by restitution would not exist as a remedy for breach of contract. This claim, we will demonstrate, is not correct. Rescission and restitution offer more than remedial convenience....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013113160