Showing 1 - 10 of 147
We revisit the two-stage duopoly game with strategic delegation and asymmetric technologies of Sen and Stamatopoulos (2015). We show that their conclusions are misled by the restrictive assumption that the extent of delegation to managers is restricted to a binary set. Allowing for a continuous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013019273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012264248
We show that Miller and Pazgal.s (2001) model of strategic delegation, in which managerial incentives are based upon relative performance, is affected by a non-existence problem which has impact on the price equilibrium. The undercutting incentives generating this result are indeed similar to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011734216
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012590220
We show that Miller and Pazgal's (2001) model of strategic delegation, in which managerial incentives are based upon relative performance, is affected by a non-existence problem which has impact on the price equilibrium. The undercutting incentives generating this result are indeed similar to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013112159
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014307282
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011535324
In a Cournot duopoly, if only one firm hires a manager while the other remains entrepreneurial, the Cournot-Stackelberg equilibrium emerges, with the managerial firm as the leader. This happens under at least three different delegation schemes. We illustrate the different meachanisms driving...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011714068
We revisit the two-stage duopoly game with strategic delegation and asymmetric technologies of Sen and Stamatopoulos (2015). We show that their conclusions are misled by the restrictive assumption that the extent of delegation to managers is restricted to a binary set. Allowing for a continuous...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011714314
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009554028