Showing 1 - 6 of 6
In three experiments, we examined how people negotiate on behalf of a constituency in which opposing factions send different signals. Participants negotiated as sellers on behalf of a group consisting of factions that favored either a cooperative or a competitive negotiation. Experiment 1 (N =...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014222553
In two experiments we studied the relation between dependency and deception in the ultimatum bargaining game. Participants could deceive the other player about the value of the chips they bargained over. Dependency was manipulated by manipulating the consequences of rejecting a proposal for both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014220740
In a computer-mediated negotiation experiment (N = 107), it is investigated how and why intragroup characteristics, such as a competitive or cooperative group norm and a negotiator's standing within the own constituent group, interplay with personality to influence the behavior of a group...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014027012
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003849221
How does a representative's position in the group influence behavior in intergroup negotiation? Applying insights from social identity theory, the effects of group member prototypicality, process accountability, and group attractiveness on competitiveness in intergroup bargaining were...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014068936
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012291100