- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
- PREFACE
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- MAIN REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Objectives
- 1.2. Background and Context
- 1.3. Evaluation Questions
- 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
- 2.1. Limited overall achievement of Phare due to institutional and operational weaknesses
- 2.2. Insufficient high-level commitment to a strategic approach for Phare assistance
- 2.3. Pervasive delays in contracting and implementation seriously hampered efficiency
- 2.4. Phare institution building for acquis sectors constrained by systemic lack of administrative capacity
- 2.5. Reasonable immediate impact; intermediate and wider impacts weak in the absence of adequate public administration reform
- 2.6. Pre-conditions for sustainability are generally fragile and insufficiently assured
- 3. THEMATIC/ CROSSCUTTING FINDINGS
- 3.1. Bulgaria’s pre-accession process was heavily dependent on Phare assistance
- 3.2. Phare achievements were restrained by under performance in horizontal PAJC
- 3.3. National preparations for Structural Funds came too late and with little enthusiasm for achievement
- 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
- 4.1. Conclusions
- 4.2. Lessons Learned
- 4.3. Recommendations
- ANNEXES
- Annex 1. Terms of Reference
- Annex 2. Phare National and CBC Programme Data for Bulgaria 1999-2004
- Annex 3. Evaluation Planning Summary Sheet
- Annex 4. Evaluation Indicators
- Annex 5. Sample projects – Financial data and results
- Annex 6. Additional Sectoral Information
- Annex 7. Legislative, procedural and institutional changes in the environmental sector
- Annex 8. Processing delays with development and approval of project fiches
- Annex 9. List of Documents
- Annex 10. List of Interviews
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476795