- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
- PREFACE
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- PŘEHLED
- MAIN REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Objectives
- 1.2. Background and Context
- 1.3. Evaluation Questions
- 1.4. Limitations affecting the evaluation
- 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
- 2.1 Overall performance was good
- 2.2 Programmes were relevant but design was uneven
- 2.3 Transfer of inputs into outputs was mostly efficient
- 2.4 Intended results in the main achieved
- 2.5 Positive immediate impact and intermediate impacts, but limited socio-economic impact
- 2.6 Institutional reforms mostly sustainable
- 3. THEMATIC/ CROSSCUTTING FINDINGS
- 3.1 Phare improved the performance of the Czech Republic’s pre-accession process
- 3.2 Successful but mixed contribution to improved administrative and judicial capacity
- 3.3 Phare ESC was clearly beneficial but limited in scope
- 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
- 4.1 Conclusions
- 4.2 Recommendations and lessons learned
- ANNEXES
- Annex 1. Terms of Reference
- Annex 2. Phare National and CBC Programme Data for Czech Republic 1999-2001
- Annex 3. Evaluation Planning Summary Sheet
- Annex 4. Evaluation Indicators
- Annex 5. Sample projects – Financial data and results
- Annex 6. Summary responses from questionnaires
- Annex 7. List of Documents
- Annex 8. List of Interviews
- Annex 9. Respondents to Questionnaires
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476798