- GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
- PREFACE
- EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- VEDANTYSIS APIBENDRINIMAS
- MAIN REPORT
- 1. INTRODUCTION
- 1.1. Objectives
- 1.2. Background and Context
- 1.3. Evaluation Questions
- 1.4. Limitations Affecting the Evaluation
- 2. PERFORMANCE OF PHARE ASSISTANCE
- 2.1 Good Overall Performance
- 2.2 Phare support has been highly relevant but there were weaknesses in addressing strategic issues
- 2.3 Despite implementation delays, planned results were largely achieved
- 2.4 Substantial results delivered
- 2.5 Strong immediate and intermediate impact in institution building projects
- 2.6 Phare focused on meeting the acquis, rather than securing sustainable reforms
- 3. THEMATIC/ CROSSCUTTING FINDINGS
- 3.1 Phare speeded up the acquis-driven reform process
- 3.2 Progress in administrative and judicial capacity at sectoral level
- 3.3 Limited ESC contribution to preparation for Structural Funds
- 4. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNED
- 4.1 Conclusions
- 4.2 Recommendations and lessons learned
- ANNEXES
- Annex 1. Terms of Reference
- Annex 2. Phare National and CBC Programme Data for Lithuania 1999-2001
- Annex 3. Evaluation Planning Summary Sheet
- Annex 4. Evaluation Indicators
- Annex 5. Sample projects – Financial data and Results
- Annex 6. List of Documents
- Annex 7. List of Interviews
- Annex 8. Written Response
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011476800