Showing 1 - 9 of 9
There exist social choice rules for which every manipulation benefits everyone. This paper constructs a large variety of rules with this property and provides two characterizations of such rules. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010949840
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147257
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005752998
We investigate the implications of relaxing Arrow's independence of irrelevant alternatives axiom while retaining transitivity and the Pareto condition. Even a small relaxation opens a floodgate of possibilities for nondictatorial and efficient social choice.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005369487
A social welfare function is Arrovian if it is transitive-valued and satisfies IIA. We examine the logical relation between the statements (A) If f is Arrovian with domain F then it is dictatorial if it satisfies the Pareto criterion and (W) If f is Arrovian with domain F then it is dictatorial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005147190
For social choice rules that can select either one or two alternatives, strategy-proofness is incompatible with a weak Condorcet principle.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596386
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596387
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596408
We examine the extent to which migration equilibria fail to exist in a global economy in which a specific division rule determines the allocation of a perfectly divisible, nondisposable resource among individuals with single-peaked preferences who reside in local economies. In particular, almost...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596468